| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Neike Taika-Tessaro Archon

Joined: 10 Aug 2006 Posts: 126 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sun Nov 05, 2006 11:21 am Post subject: True leaders... |
|
|
All right, it's more a funny than any serious musing, but I found it apt to share:
| Quote: | True leaders are born, not made - or so Napoleon Bonaparte believed. He divided his officers into four categories: the stupid and energetic; the intelligent and energetic; the stupid and lazy; and the intelligent and lazy.
According to the Napoleonic theory of leadership, the worst leaders are stupid and energetic. They will expend their limitless energy organising the most appalling cock-ups, often with disastrous consequences, then blame everyone around them, destroying morale.
By contrast, intelligent, energetic leaders will concentrate on sensible reforms. With their unflagging enthusiasm, they will initiate a host of new programmes, creating endless turmoil and dissent within the ranks.
Better are leaders who are stupid and lazy. They never initiate anything, and are far too lethargic to lead the organisation into disaster (or anywhere else).
But the best leaders are intelligent and lazy. They will have many good ideas, but will be far too indolent to put them into practice, thus ensuring they are delegated to those most capable of implementing them sensibly. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BLusk Guest of Honour

Joined: 12 Aug 2006 Posts: 32
|
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 4:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
I actually disagree with that on the principle that I believe that true leaders *can* be made through diligent training and hard work. HOWEVER, the rest is absolutely accurate beyond measure.
Now, if you can take the energetic stupid one and make an intelligent energetic one, you're in better shape. Better yet, if you can take the energetic stupid one, train him/her and make an intelligent, energetic follower who understands the principles of leadership so they can command the influence needed to carry out your will... even better!
Brian
P.S. I would forward Wisdom as a better indicator of a good leader than intelligence.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neike Taika-Tessaro Archon

Joined: 10 Aug 2006 Posts: 126 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Where would you draw the line between wisdom and intelligence? Wisdom kind of just sits there, whereas it is intelligence that lets you deal well with new and previously unhandled situations. So I think intelligence is the better term.
| Quote: | | I actually disagree with that on the principle that I believe that true leaders *can* be made through diligent training and hard work. |
I believe that, too, which is why this made me giggle so much. Both variants have elements of truth that can't be denied. But it doesn't make these any less funny! 
Last edited by Neike Taika-Tessaro on Tue Nov 14, 2006 12:23 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BLusk Guest of Honour

Joined: 12 Aug 2006 Posts: 32
|
Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 11:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The line is in the practical application of intelligence. Intelligence on its own is virtually useless if you don't know what to do with that intelligence. Hence both wisdom has one purpose, Intelligence another. Blurred lines between the two, though.
Brian |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neike Taika-Tessaro Archon

Joined: 10 Aug 2006 Posts: 126 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 12:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
From that, I get the impression you're using intelligence to mean knowledge, and wisdom to mean intelligence. Intelligence is (as already mentioned) the ability to use one's knowledge in a new, previous unencountered situation.
Which makes the term 'wisdom' a bit weird to me, overall - it makes absolutely no sense to me that you would need some extra ability to use an ability you have to use knowledge properly... that's as though someone told me I'd have to aquire some other trait if I knew how to draw well, to draw well.
So I looked it up on wikipedia, and it seems it's strongly tied in with a sense of justice and the whole perception of something being good or evil; or, in other definitions, a thing of experience, and thus a kind of redundant blah.
I say blah and not word because I get annoyed at definitions like that. Can't even lead a proper debate these days. Stupid overlapping definitions.
Struggling out of that frustration for a moment: wisdom = social intelligence? From what I'm reading. And thus, to me, clearly a subset of intelligence. Not the other way around. Certainly not superior to intelligence - if any difference should be noted, inferior.
But that's the thing with definitions of abstract stuff.
Blah.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BLusk Guest of Honour

Joined: 12 Aug 2006 Posts: 32
|
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 12:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
in‧tel‧li‧gence /ɪnˈtɛlɪdʒəns/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[in-tel-i-juhns] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun
1. capacity for learning, reasoning, understanding, and similar forms of mental activity; aptitude in grasping truths, relationships, facts, meanings, etc.
Translation: You can gather, categorize, understand and reach conclusions on information.
wis·dom (wzdm) Pronunciation Key Audio pronunciation of "wisdom" [P]
n.
1. The ability to discern or judge what is true, right, or lasting; insight.
2. Common sense; good judgment: “It is a characteristic of wisdom not to do desperate things” (Henry David Thoreau).
Translation: You can practically apply information gathered. You know that charging a superior cavalry force with a poorly-trained, smaller infantry is not a good idea. You have a pretty good clue that having a negative balance in your bank account isn't a good thing. Etc.
My take is that intelligence is having a great capacity to gather, categorize and draw conclusions on facts. Wisdom is being able to take even a lesser amount of facts and come to a correct conclusion as to what is the best thing to do to get your desired result.
Brian |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neike Taika-Tessaro Archon

Joined: 10 Aug 2006 Posts: 126 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 2:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
You've just effectively removed all humour.
Congratulations.
Edit:
Actually, if we're going to quote conviniently worded dictionary entries in our newly humourless discussion:
| wiktionary wrote: | | Capacity of mind, especially to understand principles, truths, facts or meanings, acquire knowledge, and apply it to practise; the ability to learn and comprehend. |
| wikipedia wrote: | | Intelligence is a property of mind that encompasses many related mental abilities, such as the capacities to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend ideas and language, and learn. |
| dictionary.com wrote: | | The capacity to acquire and apply knowledge. |
| dictionary.com wrote: | | The capacity to acquire and apply knowledge, especially toward a purposeful goal. |
| dictionary.com wrote: | | the ability to learn or understand or to deal with new or trying situations |
| encarta wrote: | | ability to think and learn: the ability to learn facts and skills and apply them, especially when this ability is highly developed |
| askoxford wrote: | | the ability to acquire and apply knowledge and skills. |
But thanks for assuming I didn't check on my words and needed dictionary quoting. Always lovely. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BLusk Guest of Honour

Joined: 12 Aug 2006 Posts: 32
|
Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 1:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, shucks... since most of the misunderstandings between us have been caused by differing definitions of the same *blasted* words, I was simply sharing what definitions I was using and my interpretation thereof with you so that there'd be no misunderstanding.
Clearly, I screwed that one up.
Brian |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Bluetab template design by FF8Jake of FFD
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|